Evaluating+Sources

Use the following criteria to evaluate web sources before using them as references Evaluating Web Resources
 * Evaluating Web Resources**


 * Authority **
 * Author/Organization is identifiable, i.e. biographical information about the author or institutional affiliation and address are offered.
 * Sponsor/location of the site (identified by URL or web address) is appropriate to the website's material, i.e., .edu for educational or research material.
 * Contact information for the author or producer is included in the document.
 * Mail-to link is offered for submission of questions or comments.
 * Accuracy **
 * Document includes a bibliography.
 * Author alludes to or displays knowledge of related sources, with proper attribution.
 * Author provides both sides of the argument with no evidence of bias.


 * Scope **
 * Document includes a list of additional print and electronic sources.
 * Links included appear relevant and appropriate to the site.


 * Currency **
 * Document includes a publication date or "last updated" date that is current.
 * Document includes a date of copyright/publication.


 * Purpose **
 * Intended audience is easily identifiable.
 * Intent of information (to inform, teach, sell, persuade, entertain or enlighten) is clearly stated or implied.
 * Usability **
 * Site is laid out clearly and logically with well-organized subsections.
 * Site is easy to navigate, including clearly labeled //Back, Home, Go To Top// icons/links and internal indexing links on lengthy pages.
 * Site loads quickly and is readily accessible.
 * Graphics and art serve a function.
 * All links to remote sites work.
 * Writing style is appropriate for the intended audience.
 * Text follows basic rules of grammar, spelling and literary composition.